How Prudential Norms Shape the Framework for Sustainable Banking

Prudential norms by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) are established under the guidance and provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. These norms encompass a wide array of regulations covering capital adequacy, asset classification, provisioning against non-performing assets , and exposure limits, among others.

Capital Adequacy

Under the Basel III framework, which has been adapted by the RBI, banks are required to maintain a minimum Capital to Risk-weighted Assets Ratio of 9%, higher than the Basel III requirement of 8%. This ensures that banks have enough capital buffer to absorb losses during periods of financial and economic stress.

Asset Classification

RBI mandates banks to classify their assets into four categories: Standard, Sub-standard, Doubtful, and Loss assets, based on the duration of non-performance and the realizability of the credit exposure. This classification is crucial for maintaining the transparency and integrity of the bank’s financial health.

Provisioning Norms

Based on asset classification, banks are required to set aside a certain percentage of their funds as provisions to cover potential losses from non-performing assets. These provisions act as financial buffers to safeguard the bank’s financial stability.

Exposure Norms

The RBI has set exposure norms to limit the amount of credit exposure a bank can have to a single borrower or a group of connected borrowers. This is to prevent over-concentration of credit risk.

Core Elements of Prudential Norms

Capital Adequacy Essentials

Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), also known as Capital to Risk (Weighted) Assets Ratio (CRAR), is a measure used by the RBI to assess the stability and health of a financial institution. It is expressed as a percentage of a bank’s capital to its risk-weighted assets.

Key RBI Guidelines for Capital Framework

1. RBI’s Basel III Framework Implementation

The RBI has adopted the Basel III guidelines, a global regulatory framework developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, focusing on improving regulation, supervision, and risk management within the banking sector. As per the RBI circular, Indian banks are required to maintain a minimum CAR of 9%, higher than the Basel III requirement of 8%, to safeguard against a range of risks including credit, market, and operational risks.

2. Components of Capital under Basel III

• Tier 1 Capital (Core Capital): Includes equity capital, statutory reserves, and other disclosed free reserves. It forms the primary funding source of the bank and bears the maximum risk. The RBI mandates that Tier 1 capital must be at least 7% of risk-weighted assets.
• Tier 2 Capital (Supplementary Capital): Comprises revaluation reserves, subordinated term debts, general provisions, and loss reserves. This is considered less permanent and reliable than Tier 1 capital and is limited to a maximum of 2% of risk-weighted assets for revaluation reserves and 1.25% for general provisions and loss reserves.

3.    Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA)

The RBI guidelines necessitate that banks calculate their RWAs by assigning risk weights to all their assets (including off-balance sheet exposures) based on the credit risk, market risk, and operational risk they carry. The risk weights for various asset classes are specified in the Master Circular of RBI.

4.    Capital Conservation Buffer (CCB)

Under the Basel III framework, the RBI mandates a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of RWAs, designed to ensure that banks build up capital buffers during normal times which can be drawn down as losses are incurred during a stressed period. This buffer is in addition to the minimum CAR requirements, effectively taking the total capital requirement to 11.5%.

5.    Countercyclical Buffer

This is an extension of the CCB, aimed at protecting the banking sector from periods of excessive aggregate credit growth. When activated by the RBI, banks may be required to hold additional capital up to a maximum of 2.5% of RWAs.

6.    Leverage Ratio

The RBI also introduced a leverage ratio to curb excessive leverage in the banking system. As per the Basel III norms, the minimum leverage ratio should be 3% for both global systemically important banks and other banks.

7.    Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)

These ratios ensure that banks maintain a stable funding profile in relation to their assets and off-balance sheet activities. The LCR mandates banks to hold high-quality liquid assets to cover their total net cash outflows over 30 days. The NSFR requires a minimum acceptable amount of stable funding based on the liquidity characteristics of an institution’s assets and activities over a one-year horizon.

Asset Classification Strategies and Provisioning Norms for Banks

Legal Framework

The RBI, under its regulatory purview, has delineated specific norms for income recognition, asset classification, and provisioning pertaining to advances, as encapsulated in the Master Circular RBI dated April 1, 2023. Asset classification is a critical aspect of these norms, aiming to reflect the actual risk associated with the asset portfolio of banks.

Categories of Non-Performing Assets (NPAs)

Assets are classified into various categories based on their performance, primarily focusing on NPAs. The classification is as follows:

• Standard Assets: Accounts that exhibit no signs of distress and adhere to the terms of the loan agreement.
• Substandard Assets: Assets with well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the repayment of the loan and where the account has remained NPA for a period less than or equal to 12 months.
• Doubtful Assets: Accounts that have remained in the substandard category for a period exceeding 12 months.
• Loss Assets: Assets where loss has been identified by the bank or RBI, but the amount has not been written off wholly.

Guidelines for Asset Classification

The RBI mandates banks to classify their assets based on the record of recovery. A loan is classified as an NPA if the interest and/or installment of principal remain overdue for a period of more than 90 days in respect of a term loan. The detailed asset classification norms are vital for maintaining transparency in financial statements and ensuring adequate provisioning.

Provisioning Norms for Banks

Provisioning norms are integral to the prudential framework, necessitating banks to set aside a certain percentage of funds to cover potential losses. The Master Circular specifies the provisioning requirements for different categories of assets, ensuring banks are prepared for financial uncertainties.

• Standard Assets: A general provision of 0.40% on total outstanding is required, which may vary based on the asset’s exposure to risk.
• Substandard Assets: A minimum of 15% provisioning on the outstanding amount is mandated.
• Doubtful Assets: Depending on the period for which the asset has been classified as doubtful, provisioning ranges from 25% to 100% of the secured portion and 100% of the unsecured portion.
• Loss Assets: A 100% provisioning is required as these are deemed unrecoverable.

Special Provisioning Norms

The RBI’s circular also addresses provisioning for assets affected by external factors, such as natural calamities, offering flexibility and adjustment time for banks to stabilize. Additionally, banks are encouraged to create floating provisions to strengthen their provision coverage ratio, ensuring a financial buffer against non-performing exposures.

Sector-Specific Prudential Norms

Cooperative and Regional Rural Banks: Adaptations in Capital and Asset Guidelines

The RBI has established comprehensive prudential norms to ensure the financial stability and operational resilience of the banking sector, including Cooperative Banks and Regional Rural Banks (RRBs). These norms encompass capital adequacy, asset classification, provisioning, and other regulatory measures aimed at safeguarding the banking ecosystem.

Capital Adequacy Norms for Cooperative and RRBs

Under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (As Applicable to Cooperative Societies), section 11 mandates cooperative banks to uphold a minimum capital and reserves threshold. For RRBs, the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, along with directives issued by RBI, sets the regulatory framework for capital adequacy.

RBI Master Circular on Prudential Norms for Capital Adequacy in Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks (UCBs) emphasized a structured approach towards capital adequacy. UCBs are required to maintain CRAR of 9% for Tier 1 banks and 12% for Tier 2 to 4 banks.

This bifurcation ensures that banks with varying scales of operation adhere to capital adequacy ratios conducive to their risk exposure and operational volume. This mandate aligns with the Basel-I Framework, underscoring the importance of sufficient capital as a buffer against operational and financial stress.

Tier I capital for UCBs includes elements such as:

• Paid-up share capital from regular members with voting rights.
• Contributions from associate or nominal members, subject to the bye-laws permitting share allotment and imposing withdrawal restrictions akin to those for regular members.
• Perpetual Non-Cumulative Preference Shares (PNCPS) adhering to specific regulatory requirements.
• Free reserves as per audited accounts, excluding reserves created for anticipated loan losses or to meet other outside liabilities.

Tier II capital components are restricted to 100% of the total Tier I capital, ensuring a capital foundation to support the bank’s operations and growth aspirations.

Statutory and Regulatory Framework

The statutory foundation for these norms is embedded within the Banking Regulation Act, specifically under Section 11 regarding the commencement and continuation of banking business by cooperative banks. Additionally, Section 22(3)(d) empowers the RBI to stipulate minimum entry point capital (entry point norms) for the establishment of new Primary (Urban) Cooperative Banks.

Master Circular’s Influence on Bank Capital: Unpacking the Impact on Urban and Rural Banks

The RBI plays a central role in the regulation and supervision of the banking sector in India, issuing comprehensive guidelines and norms to ensure the stability and robustness of the financial system. A critical instrument in this regulatory framework is the RBI’s Master Circular on Capital Adequacy Standards, Asset Classification, Provisioning, and various other prudential norms. This piece examines the impact of the Master Circular on the capital requirements of urban and rural banks within the Indian banking system, focusing on the legislative and regulatory backdrop.

RBI Master Circular: A Consolidation of Prudential Norms

The Master Circular on Capital Adequacy for Urban and Rural Banks is a consolidation of various guidelines issued by the RBI regarding the capital adequacy requirements based on the Basel III framework. The circular addresses critical aspects such as:

• Minimum Capital Requirements
• Capital Conservation Buffers
• Leverage Ratios
• Risk-weighted Assets
• Counter-Cyclical Buffering

The circular mandates that all scheduled commercial banks, including urban cooperative banks (UCBs) and RRBs, adhere to specified capital adequacy ratios to withstand financial stress and protect depositors’ interests.

Impact on Urban Banks

For urban cooperative banks (UCBs), the Master Circular delineates specific capital adequacy norms tailored to their operational scale and risk profiles. The norms require UCBs to maintain a minimum CRAR of 9%, aligning with the Basel III standards. This directive ensures that UCBs hold sufficient capital against their exposures to credit, market, and operational risks.

Furthermore, the circular emphasizes the need for UCBs to bolster their Tier 1 capital, consisting of core capital comprising equity capital and disclosed reserves. It signifies the importance of UCBs in maintaining internal capital buffers to absorb potential losses and continue their operations seamlessly.

Impact on Rural Banks

RRBs, catering to the financial needs of the rural populace, are also subject to the capital adequacy norms prescribed in the Master Circular. The framework mandates RRBs to maintain a CRAR of at least 9%, ensuring these banks have adequate capital against their asset portfolios.

In addition to the CRAR requirements, the circular outlines the need for RRBs to enhance their Tier 1 capital and leverage ratios, reinforcing their financial resilience. By complying with these norms, RRBs can better manage risks associated with agricultural and rural lending, which are often perceived as higher risk due to the cyclical nature of the agricultural sector and the vulnerability of rural economies to external shocks.

Advanced Insights into Prudential Norms

The Indian banking sector, regulated under the ambit of the RBI, adheres to a framework which ensures financial stability and risk mitigation. Two key aspects, “RBI’s Revised Capital Adequacy Framework” and “Investment and Risk Norms for Banks,” encapsulate the RBI’s strategic approach to safeguarding the banking ecosystem against financial discrepancies and market volatilities.

RBI’s Revised Capital Adequacy Framework

The Reserve Bank of India, in line with the Basel III guidelines, has instituted a comprehensive capital adequacy framework to strengthen the resilience of the banking sector. This framework, detailed in various RBI Master Circular – Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy – Basel III Standards which mandates banks to maintain a minimum CRAR of 9%. Furthermore, banks are required to maintain a capital conservation buffer (CCB) of 2.5%, making the effective CRAR requirement 11.5%.

This framework is pivotal in ensuring that banks are adequately capitalized to absorb a reasonable amount of losses before becoming insolvent and consequently, pose systemic risks to the financial system. The RBI’s directives specify the components of capital, divided into Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital, each with specific eligibility criteria to be recognized as capital for CRAR purposes. The emphasis on high-quality capital components underscores the RBI’s commitment to bolstering the banking sector’s ability to withstand financial and economic stress.

Investment and Risk Norms for Banks

In parallel to the capital adequacy norms, the RBI has established comprehensive investment and risk norms for banks, guiding their investment strategies and risk management practices. The Master Direction – Reserve Bank of India (Financial provided by Banks) Directions, 2016 and the “Master Direction – Risk Management and Inter-Bank Dealings” serve as the foundational texts outlining these norms.

These directives encompass a wide range of investment and risk management areas including the SLR (Statutory Liquidity Ratio) holdings in government securities, the classification and valuation of investment portfolios, and guidelines for derivatives and risk management. One of the cornerstone principles is the SLR requirement, mandating banks to maintain a certain percentage of their Net Demand and Time Liabilities (NDTL) in the form of liquid assets like cash, gold, and unencumbered government securities.

Moreover, the RBI’s investment norms stipulate a prudential approach to the bank’s trading and investment activities, ensuring that banks maintain a diversified and risk-averse investment portfolio. The directions regarding the valuation of investments, marked to market (MTM) or held to maturity (HTM), and the provisioning for depreciation on investments, are critical for maintaining the financial health of banks.

Capital Adequacy in NBFCs: Aligning NBFC Standards with Banking Norms

Capital Adequacy Requirements for NBFCs

As per the RBI’s directions, Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) must adhere to specific capital adequacy norms, similar to banks, to safeguard against credit, market, and operational risks. The RBI’s Master Direction – Non-Banking Financial Company – Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016, stipulates that:

• All deposit-taking NBFCs (NBFC-Ds) and systemically important non-deposit-taking NBFCs (NBFC-ND-SIs) are required to maintain a minimum CRAR of 15%.
• The CRAR comprises Tier I and Tier II capital, with Tier I capital needing to be at least 10% of the aggregate risk-weighted assets.

Risk Weighted Assets and Capital Components

The calculation of risk-weighted assets for NBFCs is aligned with that of banks, considering credit, market, and operational risks. The framework categorizes assets into different risk buckets, assigning risk weights accordingly. This approach ensures a comprehensive assessment of the risk profile of NBFCs’ assets, similar to the Basel III norms applied to banks.

• Tier I Capital includes equity capital and other instruments that are permanent and loss-absorbing. It forms the core capital of the NBFC, signifying financial strength.
• Tier II Capital consists of subordinated debt and other instruments that provide a supplementary cushion against unexpected losses.

Compliance with RBI Directions

The RBI periodically monitors NBFCs’ compliance with capital adequacy norms through regulatory filings and inspections. Non-compliance can result in penal actions, including restrictions on business operations and capital expenditure. Therefore, NBFCs are vigilant in maintaining the required CRAR, reflecting their commitment to financial soundness and operational resilience.

Conclusion: Summarizing Prudential Norms and Addressing Queries

The prudential norms established by the RBI, including capital adequacy requirements for NBFCs, are pivotal in ensuring the stability and resilience of the financial sector. By aligning NBFC standards with banking norms, the RBI aims to create a level playing field, enhancing the robustness of financial institutions against economic shocks and financial stress. These regulations not only protect the interests of depositors and investors but also contribute to the overall health of the financial system.

For NBFCs, adhering to these norms is not just a regulatory mandate but a strategic imperative to fortify their financial position and sustain growth. As the financial ecosystem continues to evolve, the regulatory framework for NBFCs will further adapt, ensuring that these institutions can thrive while maintaining financial stability and protecting consumer interests.

Click to know about Agrud Partners’ Practice Areas.