Introduction

Non-Banking Financial Companies, or (NBFCs), are financial institutions that provide banking services without meeting the legal definition of a bank. They are registered under the Companies Act, 2013 and operate under the regulatory purview of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as per the provisions of Chapter III-B of the RBI Act, 1934. Unlike banks, NBFCs do not hold a banking license, yet they perform functions similar to banks, such as making loans and advances, issuing credit facilities, leasing, investing in shares, and providing other marketable securities.

The definition and operation parameters for NBFCs are primarily outlined in sections 45-IA, 45-IB, and 45-IC of the RBI Act, which stipulate requirements for registration, maintenance of liquid assets, and creation of a reserve fund. Under these provisions, an NBFC must have a minimum net owned fund of ₹2 crores to be eligible for RBI registration, a crucial step in commencing operations legally.

Role of NBFCs in the Financial System

NBFCs play a crucial role in the financial system by enhancing competition and diversification in financial services. They cater to the diverse financial needs of various market segments, including small and medium enterprises (SMEs), microfinance, and consumer finance. By providing credit to unbanked and underserved areas, NBFCs significantly contribute to the financial inclusion agenda of the government.

Their importance was notably recognized in the Financial Stability Report by RBI, which emphasizes the systemic significance of NBFCs due to their deep integration with various segments of the financial markets. Furthermore, the liquidity crisis involving a prominent NBFC in recent years highlighted the contagion risk and prompted a re-evaluation of the regulatory framework governing the sector.

In response, the RBI has progressively tightened prudential norms, focusing on liquidity, risk management, and corporate governance to ensure that NBFCs operate within a safe and sound regulatory framework conducive to financial stability.

One of the pivotal legislative enhancements was the introduction of the “Scale Based Regulation” framework, which categorizes NBFCs based on their size, activity, and risk profile, thereby imposing regulatory requirements proportionate to the scale of operations and risk they pose to the system. NBFCs are instrumental in bridging the large credit gap that exists in the Indian market, especially in the informal sectors that typically do not meet the stringent credit criteria of traditional banks.

Regulatory Frameworks for NBFCs

Historical Evolution of NBFC Regulations

The regulatory oversight of NBFCs in India began in earnest with the amendments to the RBI Act in 1963, which brought these entities under the regulatory purview of the RBI for the first time. The regulatory framework has since expanded and become more sophisticated, particularly after the financial sector reforms of the early 1990s.

Significant changes were introduced with the RBI Act amendments of 1997, which mandated that all NBFCs must have a minimum net owned fund (NOF) and obtain a Certificate of Registration from the RBI. This move was aimed at ensuring only financially robust entities could operate in the sector.

The period following the global financial crisis of 2008 saw further tightening of regulations with an increased focus on risk management and liquidity standards. The introduction of the Non-Banking Financial Company – Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company (NBFC-ND-SI) category highlighted this shift towards recognizing the potential systemic risks posed by larger NBFCs.

Key Amendments and Their Impact on NBFC Operations

RBI’s Scale Based Regulation (SBR) Framework

One of the most critical regulatory updates has been the implementation of the SBR framework in October 2021. This framework categorizes NBFCs into four layers—Base Layer (BL), Middle Layer (ML), Upper Layer (UL), and Top Layer (TL)—based on their size, activity, and perceived risk.

The SBR framework applies differentiated regulatory requirements across the different layers:

• Base Layer: This layer includes non-systemically important NBFCs (non-deposit taking and with asset size up to ₹1000 crores), which pose minimal risk to the financial system. Regulations for these entities are relatively lighter, focusing mainly on disclosures and governance.
• Middle Layer: NBFC-ML are deposit-taking NBFCs irrespective of asset size, non-deposit taking NBFCs with asset size of ₹1000 crore and above, and NBFCs with asset size below ₹1000 crore but with significant interconnectedness. They are subject to enhanced regulatory requirements.
• Upper Layer: NBFC-UL are NBFCs identified as warranting enhanced regulatory requirements based on a set of parameters and scoring methodology. They are subject to additional capital, governance and disclosure requirements.
• Top Layer: Reserved for NBFCs which may be identified in the future based on their risk profile and systemic significance. This layer is intended to remain largely empty unless an NBFC grows to a scale where it becomes indispensable to the financial system stability.

This scale-based approach allows for more tailored regulation, with stricter norms applied progressively to NBFCs that have a more significant systemic impact.

NBFC Liquidity Risk Management Framework

In 2019, in response to liquidity crises in the financial sector, the RBI instituted robust liquidity risk management frameworks requiring NBFCs to:

• Maintain a liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) in a phased manner over four years starting December 2020.
• Conduct liquidity stress tests regularly.
• Have a contingency funding plan.

These measures aim to prevent liquidity mismatches and ensure NBFCs can withstand severe liquidity strains. The LCR requirement is applicable to all non-deposit taking NBFCs with asset size of ₹10,000 crore and above, and all deposit taking NBFCs irrespective of asset size.

Guidelines on Corporate Governance

The RBI has also emphasized improving governance in NBFCs. As per RBI’s 2014 revised regulatory framework for NBFCs (updated in 2015), all non-deposit accepting NBFCs with asset size of ₹500 crore and above, and all deposit accepting NBFCs irrespective of asset size, are required to constitute:

• Audit Committee
• Nomination Committee
• Risk Management Committee

Further, the RBI’s Master Circular – Non-Banking Financial Companies – Corporate Governance (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2015 required that all NBFCs put in place a Board-approved policy on related party transactions, a whistle blower mechanism, and a Code of Conduct for directors and senior management.

RBI’s Recent Regulatory Changes

Recent amendments and introductions in the regulatory framework for NBFCs have further strengthened the oversight and robustness of the sector. Some of the notable changes include:

Revision of the Regulatory Framework for Microfinance Institutions (MFIs): In November 2021, the RBI streamlined regulatory frameworks across banks and NBFCs engaging in microfinance, focusing on fostering competition and enhancing customer protection measures.

Introduction of the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) Framework: As of October 2022, the RBI implemented the PCA framework specifically tailored for NBFCs. This mechanism is designed to enable supervisory intervention at appropriate times and mandate remedial actions for NBFCs that breach certain risk thresholds, such as capital ratios, asset quality, and profitability metrics.

Guidelines on Digital Lending: Acknowledging the rapid growth in digital lending through mobile platforms and online portals, the RBI in August 2021 issued guidelines aimed at curbing unethical lending practices and protecting borrowers. These guidelines mandate that all loan disbursals and repayments are to be executed directly between the bank accounts of borrower and NBFC without any pass-through/ pool account of the lending service provider.

These regulatory advancements signify the RBI’s intent to not only streamline the regulatory framework aligning it more closely with global best practices but also to safeguard the financial system from potential shocks emanating from operational risks within the NBFC sector.

Classification and Types of NBFCs

NBFCs are classified based on their activities, scale, and the risks they carry. The classification is critical as it dictates the regulatory framework specific to each category of NBFC.

Systematically Important vs. Non-Systematically Important NBFCs

The classification of NBFCs into Systematically Important (SI) and Non-Systematically Important (Non-SI) is pivotal under the regulatory purview of the RBI. According to the RBI, an NBFC is considered Systematically Important if its asset size exceeds ₹500 crores. This threshold was articulated in the RBI’s 2014 policy paper on the framework for revitalizing distressed assets in the economy.

Systematically Important NBFCs (NBFC-ND-SI) are subjected to stricter prudential norms as their size, operations, and interconnectedness pose a higher potential risk to the financial system stability. These include mandatory ratings, higher capital adequacy requirements, and detailed disclosures that are periodically reviewed by the RBI.

Non-Systematically Important NBFCs (NBFC-ND-Non-SI), having an asset size below ₹500 crores, are governed by relatively lenient regulatory norms given their lesser potential to impact systemic stability. Their regulatory framework primarily focuses on basic operational standards and periodic reporting to the RBI but does not necessitate stringent capital or reporting requirements as compared to their systematically important counterparts.

The regulatory oversight includes periodic submission of balance sheets, profit and loss accounts, and compliance with specific sections of the RBI Act, 1934. For instance, under Section 45-IA of the RBI Act, 1934, all NBFCs must maintain a certain portion of their assets in liquid forms to meet running costs and withdrawal demands.

Specialized Financial Institutions under NBFCs

NBFCs also include specialized financial institutions that cater to specific segments of the market. These institutions are classified according to their primary business focus and are regulated under various directions issued by the RBI tailored to their operational nature.

Infrastructure Finance Companies (IFCs): These are a type of NBFC that deploys at least 75% of their total assets in infrastructure loans. They have a minimum Net Owned Fund of ₹300 crores and a minimum credit rating of ‘A’ or equivalent, and a CRAR of 15%. IFCs are crucial for funding large-scale infrastructure projects that are vital for national development.

Micro Finance Institutions (NBFC-MFIs): NBFC-MFIs provide small amounts of loans to low-income individuals or those in the informal sector who lack access to banking facilities. They are regulated under the RBI’s directions for Non-Banking Financial Company – Micro Finance Institutions (NBFC-MFIs), which stipulate a cap on the interest rate they can charge and the methodology for calculating it.

Non-Banking Financial Company – Factors (NBFC-Factors): These institutions focus on the factoring business, providing resources to manage and finance receivables. NBFC-Factors must adhere to the Factoring Regulation Act, 2011, which sets guidelines on their operations, including the registration process, rights, and duties of parties involved in factoring.

Each specialized category of NBFC brings diversity to financial services by focusing on niche markets, thereby complementing the broader banking sector’s ability to meet the varied financial needs of the Indian economy.

Compliance and Control Measures for NBFCs

Prudential Norms and Risk Management

NBFCs in India are subject to stringent prudential norms designed to uphold financial stability and ensure diligent risk management. The Reserve Bank of India, under its powers conferred by the RBI Act, 1934 and the RBI Directions, 2016, mandates a comprehensive regulatory framework to guide the operations and risk management practices of these financial institutions.

Capital Adequacy Requirements

The Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) for NBFCs is a crucial measure that ensures sufficient capital buffer to absorb a reasonable amount of losses and stops the risk of insolvency. The RBI has stipulated the following capital adequacy standards:

1. Minimum Capital Adequacy Norms: As per the Non-Banking Financial (Non-Deposit Accepting or Holding) Companies Prudential Norms (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2015, the minimum CRAR (Capital to Risk-weighted Assets Ratio) required for NBFCs-ND-SI (Non-Deposit Systemically Important) is 15% of the risk-weighted assets, effective from April 1, 2018.
2. Tier I Capital: This core capital includes equity capital and disclosed reserves and must not be less than 10% of the risk-weighted assets.

These requirements are pivotal for maintaining the financial solvency of NBFCs and enabling them to withstand potential losses arising from their business operations and financial market fluctuations.

Asset Quality and Provisioning Norms

Asset quality management is a critical aspect that NBFCs need to rigorously enforce to maintain their financial health. The RBI has established detailed guidelines for the same:

1. Asset Classification Norms: NBFCs must classify their assets into standard, sub-standard, doubtful, and loss assets based on the duration for which the asset has been non-performing and the feasibility of recovery. This classification helps in the appropriate assessment of credit risk and the setting aside of capital for potential losses.
2. Provisioning Requirements: For each category of asset, the RBI prescribes specific provisioning requirements to ensure that NBFCs set aside adequate buffer to cover potential losses. For instance, assets classified as ‘loss’ must be 100% provided for, while those falling into the ‘doubtful’ category require provisioning anywhere between 25% and 100%, depending on the period for which the asset has been doubtful.

These norms not only safeguard the NBFCs against credit risk but also ensure transparency and reliability in the financial system, boosting investor confidence. The compliance and control mechanisms in place for NBFCs, governed by the legal framework laid out by the RBI, emphasize the robustness and diligence required in managing the operations of these financial entities.

Challenges and Opportunities for NBFCs

Key Regulatory Changes and Compliance Challenges

1. SBR: Introduced by the RBI, the Scale-Based Regulation framework categorizes NBFCs into four layers based on their size, activity, and risk profile. This regulation, detailed in the RBI’s Master Direction – Non-Banking Financial Company – Scale Based Regulation (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2023, poses a compliance challenge as NBFCs need to continually assess their operations to ensure they meet the specific regulatory requirements of their respective layers.

For example, Base Layer NBFCs face fewer stringent regulations compared to those in the Upper Layer, which are subjected to a regulatory treatment akin to that of banks.

2. Corporate Governance and Risk Management: The RBI has emphasized the need for robust governance and risk management frameworks. The Master Direction on Corporate Governance (NBFCs) mandates the formation of various committees, including Risk Management Committees, and the appointment of a Chief Risk Officer, particularly for NBFCs in the upper layers. Adhering to these requirements necessitates a strategic overhaul for many NBFCs, particularly smaller players who may not have the existing infrastructure to meet these demands.

3. Liquidity Risk Management: The RBI’s guidelines on liquidity risk management require NBFCs to maintain liquidity buffers and conduct stress testing regularly. The Non-Banking Financial Company – Non-Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016, and its amendments outline the framework for liquidity coverage ratios, creating compliance challenges in maintaining requisite liquid assets.

4. KYC and Anti-Money Laundering Measures: The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, and the RBI’s guidelines on Know Your Customer (KYC) norms require NBFCs to establish procedures to prevent financial frauds and money laundering. Compliance with these measures is not only regulatory but also critical for securing the trust of investors and customers.

Opportunities in Emerging Financial Services Markets

Despite these challenges, the evolving financial landscape in India presents numerous opportunities for NBFCs, particularly in untapped or underserved markets.

Emerging Opportunities Include

1. Digital Lending Platforms: With India’s digital footprint expanding rapidly, there is a growing opportunity for NBFCs to innovate in digital lending. Technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning can be leveraged to streamline the lending process, assess credit risk more accurately, and reduce overhead costs.
2. Green Financing: As global attention shifts towards sustainable development, green finance emerges as a significant opportunity. NBFCs can offer loans for environmentally friendly projects, such as renewable energy installations or green buildings, tapping into new customer segments and benefiting from government incentives.
3. Financial Inclusion: A large segment of India’s population remains underserved by traditional banking institutions. NBFCs can bridge this gap by offering microfinance, small personal loans, and affordable housing finance, especially in rural and semi-urban areas.
4. Partnerships with FinTechs: Collaborations with FinTech companies offer NBFCs a chance to expand their service offerings and improve customer engagement through innovative technological solutions. These partnerships can also help NBFCs navigate regulatory complexities more efficiently.
5. Cross-Border Financing: As Indian companies increasingly engage in international trade, there is a rising demand for cross-border financial services. NBFCs can capitalize on this trend by offering foreign currency loans and trade finance solutions.

Conclusion

The regulatory framework for NBFCs in India, structured by the Reserve Bank of India under the RBI Act, 1934, establishes strict oversight and ensures disciplined financial operations. The SBR framework categorizes NBFCs into four distinct layers—Base, Middle, Upper, and Top—each subjected to tailored regulatory standards reflective of their operational scale and systemic importance. This framework is designed to uphold financial stability while fostering conditions conducive to growth.

With recent regulatory updates focusing on enhancing corporate governance and transparency, NBFCs are mandated to implement robust internal controls, ensure periodic disclosures, and maintain stringent auditing practices. These measures are crucial for maintaining sector integrity and building trust. As the NBFC sector continues to evolve, particularly with the advent of digital technologies, stakeholders must stay vigilant and adaptable to the regulatory changes to leverage emerging opportunities and address potential challenges effectively.

Click to know about Agrud Partners’ Practice Areas.